Vaccine Resources

Morals/Ethics/Religion:
 Immunologist:
Science:
Videos:
 Others:
Ingredients & Safety:
Pets
~*~

Can you be pro-life AND pro-vaccine?
Scientists admit aborted babies are used to create vaccines, including those bought from Planned Parenthood. These aborted fetal cells are still in the needle when vaccines are given and go into the body of those vaccinated.
Many experts claim that we are mutating our own DNA when we inject foreign DNA and cells -- not a good thing. Just one of the potential forms of harm done by vaccines.
So what do you think? Can one be pro-life and pro-vaccines at the same time?
And on the flip side, can you be pro-choice but pro mandatory vaccines? Choice over your body is choice for everything, vaccines included.

~*~


MTHFR mutations are linked to vaccine injury risk. "The toxins in the vaccine excipient ingredients need to be detoxed back out. They cause oxidative stress in the body because they slow down methylation. Then if a child takes Tylenol it lowers glutathione even more which a person needs to detox. This is why people with mthfr have an issue with shots and tend to be sensitive to medicine. They have trouble making glutathione from lower levels of folate and b complex so their methylation is slower. If methylation is slower immune function is compromised. Methylation literally rules everything in a person's body, whether mthfr is present or not. Every cell methylates every second. Vaccines hinder that. NIH said to Congress on cspan that those with methylation issues are a greater risk for severe vaccine injury."
No photo description available.

~*~

Part of our story, a dad’s perspective - (Shared with permission)
Before my wife and I had our boys we really were not confronted with having to make the vaccinate or not vaccinate decision. I had been when I was younger, but that was 30 years ago and a lot less vaccines compared to now.
When we got pregnant with Nolan we started really doing research. We googled and read studies and research papers, we prayed, we asked our pediatrician, and we talk to friends and family. My wife and I were consumed by it! We didn’t want to make a miss informed decision that could have life long complications for our first son. After all the reading and conversations we found when we talked to doctors and the medical community they had two default modes. They were either 100% for vaccinating, but could not answer our questions because they didn’t actually know anything past what had been told about them in med school. The other one was even stranger where we would ask and they would share vague statistics back. “Do you believe that the MMR is safe?” They would answer with numbers and site something they read. The second group knew something was up, they had seen stuff go very bad for children after their shots, but would not just come out and candidly talk about it. Later we would find out it’s because they were in fear that they would be pegged as anti vaccination doctors and would destroy their practice if people found out. Just think about that last sentence...they know something about vaccines that could effect patients lives, but for fear of what a large demographic of the population would say and do they don’t talk about it!
So we found ourselves after days of reading and conversations sitting on our couch trying to lock down exactly what we were going to do. What we figured out was that we didn’t want to vaccinate but kept second guessing our decision. Why? FEAR. We knew in our heart what was best for our family, but fear of the “what if” kept us running around the crazy tree. How did we get past this? We decided that we would not make any decision based off of fear, but only information. We would not vaccinate just because CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Vice, or any other outlet was pumping out horrible what ifs and sensationalizing measles outbreak’s. They were constantly talking about how deadly it is, but we were hard pressed to find any child that had died of measles in the last 40 years. FEAR.
The one mistake we did was the ”vitamin K” shot. We did do that, and our first born has had some skin issues that are directly attributed to that vaccine. That’s it though, no other vaccines have entered our two boys little bodies. They are extremely healthy and in hindsight my wife and I are so glad we didn’t. Nolan is almost 3 years old and Ryan is 8 months old. Our boys are little treasures from heaven!
One question my wife had is how do we stand up to doctors/pediatrician if they are aggressive. For me that was simple capitalism. If I go to a business and they don’t listen, berate and belittle me, and try to force me to buy one of their products against my will I will never patronize that business again. If the local restaurant owner tried to forced me to get the salmon dish but I don’t want salmon I’m not going to eat it. I just get up and leave and never go back to that restaurant. It’s the same with doctors. They work for us.
One of the hardest things to watch is friends and family who are uniformed and decide to vaccinate their babies out of fear. One family had their child regress after the MMR, stop talking, and it looks like they are on the spectrum now. The child had such a hard time communicating after the shots. Bursts of rage and even hitting was common when they could not communicate.
Another family’s child after their vaccines started getting seizures. Now the child shares that he has “tingles” and that lets mom and dad know that sometime soon a grand maul seizure is coming and they will sit up with him into the night to help. Another family has a child that changed after her vaccinations and had constant seizures. They had to go the route of having an electrode implanted into their child’s brain to try to regulate how many the child was having.
We all want what’s best for our families. There are so many decisions and so much misinformation. If I can encourage you to take a deep breath, read and study both sides of the topic, don’t make any decisions based off of fear, and go with your mom and dad gut instinct. It’s also called discernment, and when we use our discernment and it’s not wrapped up with fear it tends to be the best decision in the long run.
-Nate

~*~

Do vaccine-free children pose a risk to others?
* Tetanus? Not a communicable disease.
* Diphtheria? The vaccine is for personal protection only — it can prevent or reduce symptoms for a limited time but not prevent colonization and transmission.
* Pertussis? The vaccine is for personal protection only — it can prevent or reduce symptoms for a limited time but not prevent colonization and transmission. Asymptomatic carriage is posing a risk everywhere. And the vaccine prevents an individual from having a proper immune response making them susceptible to pertussis their entire life. And strain shift means it is not even protecting against the most commonly circulating strain. Newborns are catching pertussis from their fully vaccinated siblings.
* Mumps? Outbreaks are happening in fully vaccinated high school and college students because of primary and secondary failure and Merck is on trial for fraud regarding faking efficacy data to secure the exclusive rights to the MMR in the U.S.
* HepB? It’s not contagious in a school setting. Children who have HepB infections are allowed to attend school.
* Influenza? The vaccine does not prevent mucosal infection and studies show it doesn’t reduce transmission in close settings, like households.
* Polio? The inactivated vaccine is for personal protection, it doesn’t prevent infection or transmission in fecal matter.
* Measles? Primary failure is 2-10%, secondary a further 10% or more, and by 20 years out, around 33% fully vaccinated are estimated to be susceptible to clinical measles. A third dose has been shown not to extend protection. There are more adults and children fully vaccinated yet measles-susceptible than are using any type of exemption. A 1984 computer model showed that based solely on primary failure, by 2050, there would be more vaccinated but measles-susceptible people in the U.S. than there were prior to the introduction of the vaccine. Why does it appear as if the vaccine is so effective? Because when it was introduced virtually every single American over age 15 had lifetime immunity. Decades later, an aging population, far fewer adults with lifetime immunity, and vaccine failure is now becoming visible.

If exposed to a vaccine-targeted infection, a vaccine-free child will develop symptoms that alert parents to keep the child home. Even with measles, a fever develops a few days BEFORE rash onset, alerting parents of a possible contagious infection. Parents can check for “Koplik spots” which are small, white spots on the inside of the cheeks early in the course of measles.
If exposed to a vaccine-targeted infection, a vaccinated child might develop the full disease, alerting a parent, or the child may develop reduced or no symptoms yet still be contagious. Parents won’t know to keep the child home from school, and doctors don’t recognize the symptoms because of the vaccination status.
So which child poses the most risk in a classroom?
Education is the most important Public Health tool. Parents who learn about infectious disease symptoms, treatments, and precautions, and parents who learn about vaccine product limitations and risks, can make informed decisions to protect their children and their community, based on their personal health approaches. We can protect each other and not limit medical freedom. Knowledge is power.

~*~

WITHOUT VACCINES WE WOULD ALL BE...HEALTHIER
People pushing vaccines love to say we would all be dead without vaccines. Total BS!
Without vaccines, we would all be HEALTHIER! Yes, healthier...because the pharmaceutical industry only makes money when you're sick. Get it yet?
Do you really think Big Pharma cares about you and wants you healthy?! If you do, I have a nice bridge in London for sale.
If you look at the real yearly data, you see vaccines are NOT responsible for disease declines -- that's just what the pharmaceutical companies want you to think.
“Vaccination does NOT account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century…Nearly 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality among US children occurred before 1940 when few antibiotics or vaccines were available.” —
^^ This taken from the Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century, Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics, December 2000 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11099582
(There is a lot of other evidence here: www.LearnTheRisk.org/diseases)
--------------------------------
Without vaccines, we would all be a lot healthier and children would die a lot less often. Here are just THREE reasons of many:
1. LOWER CANCER RATES BECAUSE CHILDHOOD VIRUSES PRIME OUR SYSTEM TO FIGHT BIGGER THINGS LATER
Can you imagine how poor shareholder returns for pharmaceutical companies would be in a world without cancer? My ex-company Merck is a leading vaccine maker AND has a popular CANCER drug -- coincidence?!! Wake UP already!
There are dozens of studies on this but I'll start here...
"Our retrospective study showed a significant association between FICD [infectious childhood diseases, like measles, chickenpox, pertussis, etc] and the risk of developing cancer. The number of FICD decreased the cancer risk, in particular for non-breast cancers." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9824838
(More studies and info here: www.LearnTheRisk.org/viruses)
2. FEWER DEATHS -- LOWER SIDS RATES
The link between sudden infant death in healthy babies and toddlers and vaccines is well established in dozens of peer-reviewed, published independent science studies -- those NOT sponsored by the pharma industry. Here are a few (many more here: www.LearnTheRisk.org/SIDS):
--"Almost no SIDS prior to vaccine programs. SIDS diagnosis introduced in 1973" -- Infant mortality rates regressed against the number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there biochemical or synergistic toxicity? Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2011
-- "Over 600 cases of sudden infant death syndrome following vaccination were reported from 1990-1997." -- The epidemiology of fatalities reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system 1990-1997. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, 2001
-- "Vaccination in infants less than 3 months is associated with an INCREASED risk of sudden infant DEATH syndrome." Sudden infant death syndrome and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-poliomyelitis vaccination status. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 1995
-- "Our findings show a POSITIVE CORRELATION between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and DEATHS."
Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2012
-- "Seventeen deaths and one case of anaphylactic shock following HBV vaccination had been reported." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27174834
3. LESS EPILEPSY, LESS ALLERGIES, LESS ASTHMA, LESS MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, LESS DIABETES, LESS EAR INFECTIONS, LESS HOSPITALIZATIONS, LESS ADHD, LESS MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, LESS VISION LOSS...the list could go on and on.
And there are independent peer-reviewed studies linking vaccines to every single issue listed and dozens more. I won't list them all here (that would take all day), but you can find them here among the THOUSAND studies showing vaccines cause health issues: www.LearnTheRisk.org/studies
So what would the world be like WITHOUT VACCINES? We would all be much healthier...and the pharmaceutical industry (as well as the medical industry) would be much POORER.
Don't believe me? Fine, please take 30 flu shots in the next few months (don't worry, they will pay you!) -- because if they're so safe, why not? The more the better right?!!
The U.S. now gives babies 28 shots by age 1, you can handle 30 no problem!
So start with your 30 now, don't wait! Because we need to wake the world up, and you need to do your part.
And after 30 flu shots, you'll either be dead...or sharing my posts.
-- post by Brandy Vaughan, Founder of Learn The Risk at the end of 2018

~*~

FUN FACT: Herd immunity can only come from NATURALLY acquired illnesses -- NOT from vaccines.
Some people may be old enough to remember that just 25 years ago, measles and chicken pox were considered benign illnesses that, for centuries, were a rite of passage for children.
But now, with vaccines to sell, pharmaceutical companies want you to believe these common childhood illnesses have somehow morphed into dangerous illnesses that every parent needs to fear.
In this brilliant article, Dr. Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon, explains how herd immunity really works -- not just the fabricated story that sells vaccines and brings in big bucks.
Read it and more here: www.LearnTheRisk.org/IMMUNITY

~*~

SHOTS DURING PREGNANCY?!! NOT A GOOD IDEA...
EIGHT studies showing vaccines in pregnancy can cause miscarriage, birth defects and neurological issues. 😠
Show these to your doctor...
1. Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season?
“The aim of this study was to compare the number of inactivated-influenza vaccine-related spontaneous abortion and stillbirth (SB) reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database during three consecutive flu seasons beginning 2008/2009 and assess the relative fetal death reports associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season.” Human & Experimental Toxicology 2013 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23023030/
2. Influenza Vaccination in the First Trimester of Pregnancy and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017)
“The JAMA Pediatrics article by Zerbo et al1reported a statistically significant association between the administration of the maternal influenza vaccine in the first trimester of pregnancy and the incidence of autism spectrum disorder. The authors stated that the analysis adjusted for covariates yielded a P value of .01 when applying a Cox proportional hazards regression model to the data.” JAMA 2017 https://jamanetwork.com/…/jamapedi…/article-abstract/2617988
3. Major Birth Defects after Vaccination Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990 to 2014. 
(2017)  “We identified 50 reports of major birth defects; in 28 reports, the vaccine was given during the first trimester; 25 were reports with single vaccines administered.” Birth Defects Research 2017
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6528469
4. Neurobehavioral toxic effects of perinatal oral exposure to aluminum on the developmental motor reflexes, learning, memory and brain neurotransmitters of mice offspring
“Neurobehavioral toxic effects of perinatal oral exposure to aluminum on the developmental motor reflexes, learning, memory and brain neurotransmitters of mice offspring.”
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305711003583
5. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Formaldehyde: A Systematic Review
The mostly retrospective human studies provided evidence of an association of maternal exposure with adverse reproductive and developmental effects. Further assessment of this association by meta-analysis revealed an increased risk of spontaneous abortion.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203331
6. Adverse event reports after tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccines in pregnant women.
“The most frequent pregnancy-specific AE was spontaneous abortion in 22 (16.7%) reports.”  American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22727350
7. Association Between Prenatal Exposure to Metals and Neonatal Morbidity
The CP ratio was higher (1) in subjects with Al, (2) in mothers to newborns diagnosed as small-for-gestational age (p value = .052), (3) neonates that weighed less (p value = .079), and (4) in women who experienced repeated abortions (p value = .049). Our findings suggest the possibility of metal-induced oxidative stress.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15287394.2014.932313
8. Birth defects among infants born to women who received anthrax vaccine in pregnancy.
“In response to bioterrorism threats, anthrax vaccine has been used by the US military and considered for civilian use. Concerns exist about the potential for adverse reproductive health effects among vaccine recipients.” American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/18599489
More here: www.LearnTheRisk.org/vaccines

~*~

Babies are not born low in Vit K. They’re all born with the levels their bodies can utilize. Even doing the oral is harmful and can tax their tiny liver. It may not have the bad ingredients but they don’t need it. 
First, in order to absorb vitamin K we have to have a functioning biliary and pancreas system. Your infant’s digestive system isn’t fully developed at birth which is why we give babies breast milk (and delay solids) until they are at least 6-months-old, and why breast milk only contains a small amount of highly absorbable vitamin K. Too much vitamin K could tax the liver and cause brain damage (among other things). As baby ages and the digestive tract, mucosal lining, gut flora, and enzyme functions develop, baby can process more vitamin K. Low levels of vitamin K at birth just…makes…sense.

Secondly, cord blood contains stem cells, which protect a baby against bleeding and perform all sorts of needed repairs inside an infant’s body. Here’s the kicker, in order for a baby to get this protective boost of stem cells, cord-cutting needs to be delayed and the blood needs to remain thin so stem cells can easily travel and perform their functions. Imagine that, baby has his/her own protective mechanism to prevent bleeding and repair organs…that wasn’t discovered until after we started routinely giving infants vitamin K injections.

Third, a newborn might have low levels of vitamin K because it’s intestines are not yet colonized with bacteria needed to synthesize it and the “vitamin K cycle” isn’t fully functional in newborns. It makes sense then to bypass the gut and inject vitamin K right into the muscle right? Except baby’s kidneys aren’t fully functional either. 

Fourth, babies are born with low levels of vitamin K compared to adults, but this level is still sufficient to prevent problems; vitamin K prophylaxis isn’t necessarily needed.

Finally, several clinical observations support the hypothesis that children have natural protective mechanisms that justify their low vitamin K levels at birth . I don’t know about you, but we should probably figure out why that is before we “inject now and worry about it later.”

Do you know why vitamin K is pushed on parents and their children? Because pharmaceutical companies don’t like to lose money, doctors don’t like to be questioned, the American Academy of Pediatrics dare not change its recommendations.

Since 1985, the medical profession has known that oral vitamin K raises blood levels 300 - 9,000 times higher. The injectable vitamin K, results in vitamin K levels 9,000 times thicker than adults blood.

Baby's blood thickened with vitamin K, causes a situation where stem cells have to move through sludge, not nicely greased blood vessels full of blood which can allow stem cells easy acess to anywhere. Maybe one day it will dawn on the medical profession that not only are cord blood stem cells important and useful to the newborn baby, but that stem cells need to thin blood for a reason.

Any fetus which gets being wrung out like a wet towel while travelling down a narrow drain pipe, can incur damage in any part of the body, including in the brain, and needs an in-built fix-it. And stem cells cross the brain blood barrier. In fact, stem cells can go ... anywhere!!! Amazing don't you think. God's design has solutions for situational problems. Three solutions, actually. The second is the fact that naturally, in the first few days, a baby's blood clotting factors are lower than normal.

But ... pediatricians consider this a ... "defect" ... so want to give vitamin K which results in blood nearly 100 times thicker than an adult's. This vitamin K injection, so they say ... (like they say immediate cord clamping is safe, and normal, and delayed cord clamping is an unproven intervention) ... is because the baby wasn't designed right, and if you don't give a vitamin K injection, the baby "could bleed to death.”

It's not for nothing that the vitamin K syringe, sits right alongside that cord clamp and the scissors!

But there is an unanswered question: 

"Why are blood clotting factors in babies low in the first few days after birth? Why has a baby got much thinner blood as a result?"

Might a logical hypothesis be, that thinner blood allows freer and quicker access of cord blood stem cells to any part of the body damaged during birth? After all, why should stem cells have to fight through a baby's blood which is now 100 times thicker than any adult's, courtesy of another needle?

~*~

IF YOU VACCINATE In the first 6 years of life your child receives the following:
•17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
•5,700 mcg aluminum (neurotoxin)
•Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (cow blood)
•801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
•23,250 mcg gelatin (ground up animal caucuses)
•500 mcg human albumin (human blood)
•760 mcg of monosodium L-glutamate (causes obesity & diabetes)
•Unknown amounts of MRC-5 cells (aborted human babies)
•Over 10 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
•Over 0.075 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
•Over 560 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
•116 mcg potassium chloride (used in a lethal injection)
•188 mcg potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent)
•260 mcg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda)
•70 mcg sodium borate (Borax, used for cockroach control)
•54,100 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
•Unknown amounts of sodium citrate (food additive)
•Unknown amounts of sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive)
•2,800 mcg sodium phosphate (toxic to any organism)
•Unknown amounts of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
•32,000 mcg sorbitol (Not to be injected)
•0.6 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
•Over 40,000 mcg sucrose (cane sugar)
•35,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
•5,000 mcg urea (metabolic waste from human urine)
•Other chemical residuals

(From the book, "What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don't Want You To Know About Vaccines" - By Dr. Todd M. Elsner)

~*~

Vaccines contain a high level of toxins injected into the body at one time.
The toxins in the vaccine, particularly heavy metals like mercury, barium, and aluminum, usually head straight to the brain causing neurological damage like autism, speech delays, Alzheimer's, etc. Although once in the brain, they travel down the lymphatic system to the gut. And sometimes they end up elsewhere as well.
For example, aluminum has been found in muscle tissues causing myopathy and in arthritic joints and in bones causing osteoporosis.
The toxic effects of vaccines many times are visible immediately, particularly as a skin issue (rash, hives, eczema, etc). Sometimes the effect can be severe like in seizures, for example, and will start right away. Other times, the toxins will accumulate in the body.
Each new vaccine will cause further damage. And eventually, the body will reach a state of over-toxicity and a health issue will develop. It can be such a gradual change that it may all seem ‘normal’ as it manifests as allergies or asthma, but this is NOT normal. No matter whether you visibly see the effects or not, vaccines carry toxins that can have profound effects on your health, either directly after the vaccine or in the longer term.

~*~

By safety tested, I mean that vaccines are not run through the same rigorous trials as drugs. A “vaccinated vs. unvaccinated” study has never been conducted. No one has ever done a double-blind placebo controlled study on multiple-dose vaccines given multiple times.

"Vaccines are a type of ‘unavoidably unsafe’ product; that is, a vaccine is a product that is incapable of being made safe for its intended and ordinary use. The Court in Bruesewitz notes that NCVIA expressly eliminates liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects:

No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa-22(1).

And so, the Court engages in bottom-up thinking, reasoning backwards from its desired outcome. The Court takes as true the premise that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe." http://pilr.blogs.pace.edu/.../supreme-court-gives-big.../

The medical professionals are only taught three things about vaccines: that they are safe, effective, and responsible for keeping "deadly" diseases at bay. They aren't taught about the ingredients, or how those ingredients could affect the human body. Therefore, they don't inform their patients of the possible side effects, as they do with other drugs. If vaccines are questioned, they wave the parent(s) off as crazy and force the "safe and effective" dogma down their throats. Since when is questioning the safety of something not allowed? That's not American. If we permit something to be forced on us, we let that freedom of choice be stripped away. We need informed consent, and only allowing one side of the equation to be examined is not informing the patient. There are TWO sides that require equal deliberation and consideration.

Many people and doctors are unaware that vaccines contain mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum, polysorbate 80, cell lines from HUMAN aborted fetuses, tissue from hamsters, dog kidneys, monkeys, chickens & chicken eggs, peanut oil adjuvants and much more. These substances are allergenics, neurotoxins, heavy metals, foreign DNA and blood, and toxic substances that stimulate unhealthy inflammation, bypass the immune system, wreak havoc on the gut flora, and get transported directly through the blood-brain barrier and deposit themselves in the brain. Wonder why we have so many kids with peanut allergies? Vaccines. Autism? Vaccines. Seizures? Vaccines. Autoimmune disorders like my diabetes, Hashimoto's, Celiac? Vaccines. SIDS? Vaccines.

Measles is hugely blown out of proportion. We haven't had any measles deaths in over a decade. Like chickenpox, it is a childhood disease that should be allowed to run its course. This provides the child with lifelong natural immunity and protection against cancer. Vaccines offer no immunity, or temporary at best (Booster shots? So vaccines don't work forever and we have to get more to stay protected? Um, that's not right), and they don't even work for everyone! Think about it: some vaccinated people still get the measles. Some non-vaccinated don't get the measles. How does that work?

It's actually been found that highly vaccinated populations spread the disease. Take measles for instance: "20 years ago, scientists working at the CDC's National Center for Infectious Diseases, funded by the WHO and the National Vaccine Program, discovered something truly disturbing about the MMR vaccine: it leads to detectable measles infection in the vast majority of those who receive it. People who receive live-virus vaccines, such as the MMR, can then shed that live virus, for up to many weeks and can infect others. Other live-virus vaccines include the nasal flu vaccine, shingles vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, chicken pox vaccine, and yellow fever vaccine." https://www.greenmedinfo.com/.../vaccinated-spreading...

Vaccines aren't a one-size fits all. Babies are given the same dose as a full grown adult. How is that right? Aren't we supposed to tailor the dose to the weight and size of the recipient? But that's not done.

Not to mention the fact that the manufacturers can't be held liable for any injuries, deaths, or adverse reactions cause by a vaccine. According to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, a fund set up by the government and paid for by the taxpayers pays out certain cases that claim vaccines caused injury or death. It protects the manufacturers from having to pay compensations themselves. In other words, you can't take them to court like you can a car seat manufacturer. They get off scot-free. I don't like that. If you're going to be making a drug that can cause harm, you better be able to be held liable! No one gets a free pass on that!

The CDC's statistics can't all be trusted. They bank on vaccines and fear-mongering to drive their profit. Of course they are going to have information on their website that paints them in a favorable light. It's technically a conflict of interest for them. They want us to fear the diseases and to put absolute trust in the vaccines to keep you safe and healthy. The truth is that honest people who used to work for them have caught them disposing of evidence that they have not done their due diligence in making sure vaccines are as beneficial as they say they are, and hiding the fact that they are harmful. The CDC doesn't want you to know that the diseases for which we have vaccines were well on their way out before those vaccines came on the scene, thanks to proper sanitation, hygiene, food, and clean water. We have the ability to treat diseases like measles, chickenpox, etc. without needing a vaccine. Or is our country not the leading healthcare provider in the world?

All of these things throw up a red flag for me, especially the ingredients, which are not Biblically-friendly, and the immunity they have from lawsuits. How can we trust anyone who's not willing to be held accountable? Would you trust someone who is dishonest, and does whatever they can to avoid punishment for wrongs they clearly committed? I have researched vaccines for two years now and I have other resources on my blog from people who have studied them even longer. If someone's going to tout something as "safe and effective," yet it has been shown to cause harm and death, it's not really fit to be called "safe and effective," and I'm not going to trust it to be given to me or my child.


~*~  
 
Safe MAXIMUM daily exposure to Aluminum PER THE FDA:
1. 8lb baby - 18.6 mcg Aluminum
2. 15lb baby – 34.5 mcg Aluminum
3. 30lb toddler – 68.1 mcg Aluminum
4. 50lb child – 113 mcg Aluminum
5. 150lb adult – 340.5 mcg Aluminum
6. 350lb adult – 794.5 mcg Aluminum


How much aluminum is in the vaccines that are routinely given to children?
1. Hib – 225 mcg Aluminum
2. Hep B – 250 mcg Aluminum
3. DTaP – 170 – 625 (depending on the manufacturer) mcg Aluminum
4. Pneumococcus – 125 mcg Aluminum
5. Hep A – 250 mcg Aluminum
6. HPV – 225 mcg Aluminum
7. Pentacel (DTaP, hip, & Polio combo) – 330 mcg Aluminum
8. Pediarix (DTaP, hep b, & Polio combo) – 850 mcg Aluminum

Hep B facts about newborns in the USA:
1. If baby is born at 8lbs, the amount of the Heb B vaccine given at birth, is 14x the “safe” amount.
*** At the 2 month, 4 month, and 6 month appointments the routinely given vaccines combined add up to more than 1,000 mcg of Aluminum. According to the FDA limits that amount isn’t even safe for a 350lb adult!
And these figures are based on a premise that there is a safe threshold for aluminum!! Which there probably isn't!
Aluminum is Neurotoxic.
Glyphosate(RoundUp!) is in the vaccines – just recently discovered. The animals used in the vaccines are eating grains sprayed with this pesticide. This is a very recent discovery. The WHO said Round Up is most likely a carcinogen.
(Via: The Truth about Vaccines Episode 2)
Tough information to take in. I know. Be informed."
-Alex Braskey Hartinger

No comments: